<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Daniel Rock · AI Fault Line</title><link>https://aifaultline.com/authors/daniel-rock/</link><description>New papers by Daniel Rock in the AI Fault Line guide, and news naming them.</description>
<item><title>Paper: Extending “GPTs Are GPTs” to Firms</title><link>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1257-pandp-20251045/</link><guid>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1257-pandp-20251045/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The paper combines occupation-level LLM exposure scores with Revelio Labs employee counts to measure exposure for individual firms. Firms with more technology and AI-skilled workers are more exposed, and the authors read the size of the differences as a sign that integrating LLMs could bring significant productivity gains.</description></item>
<item><title>Paper: The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies</title><link>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1257-mac-20180386/</link><guid>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1257-mac-20180386/</guid><pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Argues that general-purpose technologies like AI require large, often-intangible complementary investments that official statistics undercount, producing a &#x27;Productivity J-curve&#x27;: measured productivity growth is understated early in a technology&#x27;s diffusion and overstated later as those investments pay off. Applying the model to U.S. data on computer hardware and software, the authors estimate 2017 total factor productivity was 15.9% higher than official figures once intangible capital is included — a key reference point for economists arguing today&#x27;s modest measured AI productivity gains understate its eventual impact.</description></item>
</channel></rss>
