<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Tyna Eloundou · AI Fault Line</title><link>https://aifaultline.com/authors/tyna-eloundou/</link><description>New papers by Tyna Eloundou in the AI Fault Line guide, and news naming them.</description>
<item><title>Paper: Extending “GPTs Are GPTs” to Firms</title><link>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1257-pandp-20251045/</link><guid>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1257-pandp-20251045/</guid><pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The paper combines occupation-level LLM exposure scores with Revelio Labs employee counts to measure exposure for individual firms. Firms with more technology and AI-skilled workers are more exposed, and the authors read the size of the differences as a sign that integrating LLMs could bring significant productivity gains.</description></item>
<item><title>Paper: GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models</title><link>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-48550-arxiv-2303-10130/</link><guid>https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-48550-arxiv-2303-10130/</guid><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>Combining human ratings with GPT-4 classifications, finds that roughly 80% of the U.S. workforce could see at least 10% of their tasks affected by large language models, and about 19% could see over half their tasks affected, with higher-wage occupations facing greater exposure than lower-wage ones. With an LLM alone about 15% of all worker tasks could be completed significantly faster, rising to 47-56% when LLM-powered software tools are included — evidence often cited to argue AI functions as a general-purpose technology with economy-wide reach rather than a narrow labor-saving tool.</description></item>
</channel></rss>
