---
title: "Robot Imports and Firm-Level Outcomes · AI Fault Line"
url: https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1093-ej-ueae055/
description: "AI Fault Line is a neutral, evidence-cited field guide to why experts looking at the same developments disagree about AI's effect on productivity, jobs, inequality, regulation and the pace of change."
---

[Research](https://aifaultline.com/research/)

# Robot Imports and Firm-Level Outcomes

Alessandra Bonfiglioli, Rosario Crinò, Harald Fadinger, Gino Gancia · The Economic Journal · 24 Jun 2024

[Read original source](https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae055) Open access

Where this sits in the debate

- [Will AI actually boost productivity and growth?](https://aifaultline.com/debate/productivity/)

- [Will AI destroy more jobs than it creates?](https://aifaultline.com/debate/jobs/)

Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model ([AI-written](https://aifaultline.com/about/)).

## Abstract

Abstract We use French data over the 1994–2013 period to study how imports of industrial robots affect firm-level outcomes. Guided by a simple model, we develop a novel empirical strategy to identify the causal effects of robot adoption. Our results suggest that, while demand shocks generate a positive correlation between robot imports and employment at the firm level, exogenous exposure to automation leads to job losses. We also find that robot exposure increases labour productivity and some evidence that it may raise the relative demand for high-skill professions.

## About this publication

**Leading field journal.** A leading journal in economics or a neighbouring field (on the Tinbergen Institute’s A list or near the top of the RePEc ranking), or a top-rated computer-science venue.

Placed by: Tinbergen Institute A list. [How sources are ranked](https://aifaultline.com/about/#source-ranking).

Published

2024 (28 months ago)

Citations

87 (OpenAlex)

## Citations in context

[Chart: 87 citations, cohort median 47]

87 citations — 83rd
percentile among the 23 indexed papers from 2024 in this collection.
Citation counts favor older papers; this compares only same-year papers here,
not the whole literature.

[Chart: published 2024]

□ added to this collection in 2026.

## More on this topic

Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.

- [The Effects of Generative AI on High Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers](https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-2139-ssrn-4945566/) SSRN · 2024

- [GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models](https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-48550-arxiv-2303-10130/) arXiv · 2023

- [Extending “GPTs Are GPTs” to Firms](https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1257-pandp-20251045/) AEA Papers and Proceedings · 2025

- [New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018](https://aifaultline.com/research/p/doi-10-1093-qje-qjae008/) The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2024

Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata.
[How this site is built](https://aifaultline.com/about/).
