Miracle or Myth? Assessing the macroeconomic productivity gains from Artificial Intelligence
Francesco Filippucci, Peter Gal, Matthias Schief · OECD artificial intelligence papers · 22 Nov 2024
Where this sits in the debate
- Will AI actually boost productivity and growth? · its finding: it depends (why studies differ)
- How fast will the impact arrive? · its finding: it depends (why studies differ)
Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model (AI-written).
Key takeaway AI-written
This OECD paper combines micro-level performance gains, exposure of activities to AI and expected adoption rates in a multi-sector general-equilibrium model with input-output links. It estimates AI will add 0.25-0.6 percentage points to annual aggregate TFP growth (0.4-0.9 points for labour productivity) over ten years.
The paper in three steps AI-written
Written by an AI agent from the paper's abstract, which is the primary source and is quoted below.
How to read it: macro-projection. A model-based scenario, not a measurement — assumptions drive the range; compare against other projections.
Limitations and counterpoints AI-written
Projections depend on assumed adoption paths and on transferring micro-level estimates to the whole economy.
Abstract
The paper studies the expected macroeconomic productivity gains from Artificial Intelligence (AI) over a 10-year horizon. It builds a novel micro-to-macro framework by combining existing estimates of micro-level performance gains with evidence on the exposure of activities to AI and likely future adoption rates, relying on a multi-sector general equilibrium model with input-output linkages to aggregate the effects. Its main estimates for annual aggregate total-factor productivity growth due to AI range between 0.25-0.6 percentage points (0.4-0.9 pp. for labour productivity). The paper discusses the role of various channels in shaping these macro-level gains and highlights several policy levers to support AI's growth-enhancing effects.
About this publication
Academic journal. Published in an academic journal — typically peer-reviewed before publication, though indexing alone doesn't guarantee review depth.
- Published
- 2024 (23 months ago)
- Citations
- 50 (OpenAlex)
50 citations recorded by OpenAlex — too few 2024 papers in this collection for a fair comparison.
□ added to this collection in 2026.
Cited elsewhere in this guide
Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.
- Navigating the Jagged Technological Frontier: Field Experimental Evidence of the Effects of AI on Knowledge Worker Productivity and Quality
SSRN · 2023 - Generative AI at Work
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2025 - The Impact of AI on Developer Productivity: Evidence from GitHub Copilot
arXiv · 2023 - The Productivity J-Curve: How Intangibles Complement General Purpose Technologies
American Economic Journal Macroeconomics · 2020
Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata. How this site is built.