From Automation Surplus to Economic Circulation: Zonal Contribution and Settlement Systems—Fiscal Stress Testing, Capitalisation, and the Limits of Cross-Border Redistribution
John F. Ryder · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2 Nov 2026
Read original sourceOpen access
Where this sits in the debate
- Will AI widen inequality? · its finding: it depends (why studies differ)
- Should governments act on AI now?
Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model (AI-written).
Abstract
Advanced automation can change the geography of economic value without moving public obligations in corresponding proportions. An exporting economy may retain productive surplus while an importing economy faces pressure on wages, tax receipts or demand. Such outcomes are possibilities, not necessary consequences of automation: existing research also finds productivity gains and limited short-run employment losses in firms adopting artificial intelligence. This paper consolidates four progressively demanding investigations of a proposed Zonal Contribution and Settlement System (ZCSS): a three-economy fiscal stress test (v0.4); a cross-border capital-market counterfactual (v0.5); a contract-receivables and debt-coverage exercise (v0.6); and a public-company participation screen with a prospective invoice-level price-incidence protocol (v0.7). In the synthetic 5% gross labour-income compression case, 2040 combined unmet public/household support is €3.569 billion with domestic instruments, €3.441 billion with unrestricted grants, and €3.468 billion with the restricted ZCSS allocation. In a separately sourced contractual-contribution experiment, direct annual distribution yields less 2040 unmet funding than bond or equity financing. Under a specified simultaneous import and margin contraction, a €1 billion ten-year bond has an approximately €0.856 billion modelled principal shortfall; a 1.30 debt-service-coverage screen reduces the illustrative issue size to €0.305 billion. Public company disclosures identify businesses suitable for exploratory approaches but do not establish contract participation, invoice-level receipts, automation-attributable surplus or consumer price incidence. The paper's additional institutional contribution is a Six-Gate Institutional Feasibility Test—authority, commercial participation, audit, incidence, collection and governance—specifying the evidence, independent review, prospective failure conditions and decisions required at each stage. The
About this publication
Preprint. Posted on a preprint server or repository (arXiv, SSRN, Zenodo and others) before or without peer review. Anyone can post there.
- Published
- 2026 (recently)
- Citations
- 0 (OpenAlex)
0 citations recorded by OpenAlex — too few 2026 papers in this collection for a fair comparison.
Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.
- The Effects of Generative AI on High Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers
SSRN · 2024 - GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
arXiv · 2023 - Extending “GPTs Are GPTs” to Firms
AEA Papers and Proceedings · 2025 - New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2024
Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata. How this site is built.