DIGITAL COMMUNISM IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: Artificial abundance, the devaluation of human labour, and the reconfiguration of economic value
Younes Bennane · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2 Nov 2026
Read original sourceOpen access
Where this sits in the debate
- Will AI destroy more jobs than it creates?
- Will AI widen inequality? · its finding supports the claim (why studies differ)
Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model (AI-written).
Abstract
The history of economics is inseparable from the evolution of the means of production. Every major technological transformation has altered the relationship between capital, labour, and the creation of wealth. Industrial mechanisation gradually replaced part of human physical effort with mechanical power. Computerisation subsequently automated many administrative, accounting, and information-processing operations. Today, generative artificial intelligence is introducing a different kind of rupture: it is directly involved in activities that traditionally relied on individuals’ cognitive, intellectual, and creative capacities. This transformation raises a fundamental question: what happens to the economic value of human labour when technologies make it possible to reproduce, accelerate, and standardise an increasingly large share of an individual’s productive capacities? The issue is not simply the possible disappearance of certain occupations. It concerns a deeper transformation in the mechanisms through which labour is valued. Artificial intelligence can substantially increase an individual’s productivity without guaranteeing a proportionate increase in remuneration. It may even reduce the market value of certain skills by making their use more accessible, faster, and less costly. We are therefore confronted with a paradox: individuals have access to increasingly powerful means of intellectual production, yet this increase in their productive capacity no longer necessarily secures them a stronger economic position. This contradiction is the starting point of our inquiry. We put forward the hypothesis that artificial intelligence is gradually separating three dimensions that were historically closely connected: the capacity to produce, the individual contribution to production, and the ability to capture a share of the wealth created. To analyse this transformation, we propose three organising concepts: digital communism, artificial abundance, and the tendency towar
About this publication
Preprint. Posted on a preprint server or repository (arXiv, SSRN, Zenodo and others) before or without peer review. Anyone can post there.
- Published
- 2026 (recently)
- Citations
- 0 (OpenAlex)
0 citations recorded by OpenAlex — too few 2026 papers in this collection for a fair comparison.
Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.
- The Effects of Generative AI on High Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers
SSRN · 2024 - GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
arXiv · 2023 - Extending “GPTs Are GPTs” to Firms
AEA Papers and Proceedings · 2025 - New Frontiers: The Origins and Content of New Work, 1940–2018
The Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2024
Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata. How this site is built.