Skip to content

Research

Does the AI Productivity Dividend Diminish? A Validated Framework for Identifying the Shape of Firm-Level Returns to Artificial Intelligence

Louis Agyekum · 13 Oct 2026

Read original sourceOpen access

Where this sits in the debate

Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model (AI-written).

Abstract

Forecasts of the productivity dividend from artificial intelligence (AI) differ by an order of magnitude, partly because they extrapolate average gains observed among early, highly exposed adopters. Whether those gains scale linearly, flatten, or are competed away is an empirical question about the shape of the return to AI, not its average. This paper develops and validates a design-based framework for measuring that shape with linked firm–worker data. The framework combines a pre-determined, occupation-based measure of firm exposure to generative AI with a continuous-treatment difference-in-differences design around the release of ChatGPT in November 2022, three pre-specified tests of concavity, a decomposition of exposure effects into an adoption margin and a per-adopter return, a doubly robust analysis of use intensity, a staggered-adoption analysis of earlier AI adopters, and a production-function estimator that places AI in the law of motion of productivity. We validate every component on a calibrated synthetic panel of 20,000 enterprises that reproduces the structure of Statistics Canada's linked business microdata and embeds a known concave effect. The estimators recover the true dose–response curve and detect its concavity (slope difference −0.010, standard error 0.003, one-sided p = 0.002); Monte Carlo coverage of the main confidence interval is 0.97, and the concavity test has power of 0.93. The validation also exposes a practical pitfall: pre-trend tests clustered at roughly 40 industries over-reject a true null. The framework, released as open code, is ready for application to Canadian enterprise microdata, where it will inform estimates of potential output and the persistence of Canada's productivity gap.

About this publication

Venue not recorded. Publication venue not recorded by our data source — check the paper's landing page for where it appeared.

Published
2026 (recently)
Citations
0 (OpenAlex)

0 citations recorded by OpenAlex — too few 2026 papers in this collection for a fair comparison.

2020202120222023202420252026 published

More on this topic

Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.

Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata. How this site is built.