Skip to content

Research

From Hype to ROI: An Economic Model for LLM Adoption in Information Systems and Security Operations

Pellegrino Casoria, Andrea Araldo, Rosario Patanè, Simon Pietro Romano · arXiv · 23 Oct 2026

Read original sourceOpen access

Where this sits in the debate

Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model (AI-written).

Key takeaway AI-written

The paper builds a Monte Carlo model of the returns to adopting large language models in operational information systems, weighing productivity gains against inference, infrastructure and error-remediation costs. Applied to security operations centres, most configurations of model and price turn out unprofitable, with profit limited to high-accuracy, low-uncertainty deployments.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) promise significant efficiency gains across information-intensive operations by automating repetitive language-based tasks. However, adoption decisions remain largely opportunistic, as organizations struggle to move from pilots to sustainable industrialization. Without systematic economic frameworks, practitioners cannot assess whether LLM investments create value in a given context. This paper develops a general economic model to support informed LLM adoption decisions in operational information systems. Facing high uncertainty, we represent parameters as random variables centered on authoritative benchmarks, and evaluate the model by Monte Carlo simulation across pessimistic-to-optimistic assumptions on LLM efficiency. The ROI distributions show the probability of profitability and the Value at Risk for each configuration, together with a sensitivity analysis of its main drivers. As a first instantiation, we apply the model to Security Operations Centers (SOCs), mapping workflows onto established standards to identify tasks suited to LLM augmentation. The model balances productivity gains, driven by alert volume, analyst effort, and LLM efficiency, against operational costs, including inference, infrastructure, and error remediation, covering both cloud API and self-hosted deployments. Results show that adoption economics are context-dependent, and that automation is an exploitable lever, gated by accuracy, while the cost of errors and the model's price are secondary. Across the analyzed models and prices, most configurations are unprofitable, with profitability limited to high-accuracy, low-uncertainty deployments. The model gives organizations a quantitative basis for evidence-based adoption decisions, by locating the boundary between profit and loss, and the loss risked beyond it.

About this publication

Preprint. A preprint — posted publicly before or without journal peer review; findings may still be revised.

Published
2026 (recently)
Citations
Not recorded for this source

Citation counts come from OpenAlex; none are recorded for this source — absence of a count is not absence of citations.

2020202120222023202420252026 published

More on this topic

Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.

Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata. How this site is built.