Forecasting the Economic Effects of AI
Ezra Karger, Otto Kuusela, Jason Abaluck, Kevin A. Bryan, Basil Halperin, Todd R. Jones, Connacher Murphy · NBER Working Paper 35046 · 15 Mar 2026
Where this sits in the debate
- Will AI actually boost productivity and growth? · its finding: it depends (why studies differ)
- Will AI destroy more jobs than it creates? · its finding supports the claim (why studies differ)
- How fast will the impact arrive? · its finding: it depends (why studies differ)
Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model (AI-written).
Key takeaway AI-written
The authors survey five groups (academic economists, AI company staff, AI policy researchers, top forecasters and the public) on how AI will affect the US economy. The median respondent in each group expects annual GDP growth of 2.5% and small declines in labor force participation; under a rapid-progress scenario, experts expect growth near 4% and participation falling to 55% by 2050, about half of it attributed to AI.
The paper in three steps AI-written
Written by an AI agent from the paper's abstract, which is the primary source and is quoted below.
How to read it: survey. Self-reported data from firms or individuals — good for perceptions and adoption; answers can differ from behavior.
Limitations and counterpoints AI-written
These are elicited beliefs, not measured outcomes; the abstract does not report sample sizes or how respondents were recruited.
Source excerpt
We elicit forecasts of how AI will affect the U.S. economy, comparing the beliefs of five groups: academic economists, employees at AI companies, policy researchers focused on AI, highly accurate forecasters, and the general public. The median respondent in each group expects substantial advances in AI capabilities by 2030, small declines in labor force participation consistent with demographic shifts, and an annual GDP growth rate of 2.5%, which exceeds both the typical medium-run (2.0%) and long-run (1.7%) baseline forecasts from government agencies and privatesector forecasters. Conditional on a “rapid” AI progress scenario, in which AI systems surpass human performance on many cognitive and physical tasks, experts forecast substantial, though not historically unprecedented, economic shifts: annualized GDP growth rising to around 4% and the labor force participation rate falling from its current level of 62% to 55% by 2050, with roughly half of that decline—equivalent to around 10 million lost jobs—attributable to AI.
About this publication
Industry report. An industry or consultancy report — produced outside academic peer review.
- Published
- 2026 (7 months ago)
- Citations
- Not recorded for this source
Basil Halperin, Kevin Bryan signed the wemustactnow.ai letter — part of why this paper is in the collection.
Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.
- The Effects of Generative AI on High Skilled Work: Evidence from Three Field Experiments with Software Developers
SSRN · 2024 - GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models
arXiv · 2023 - Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence
Science · 2023 - The simple macroeconomics of AI
Economic Policy · 2024
Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata. How this site is built.