Macro-Prudential AI Governance: A Two-Layer Early Warning and Response System for Frontier AI
Pranav Mehta · arXiv · 3 Jul 2026
Read original sourceOpen access
Where this sits in the debate
- Should governments act on AI now? · its finding supports the claim (why studies differ)
Direction of the finding as read from the abstract by an AI model (AI-written).
Abstract
Frontier-AI governance today faces a problem structurally analogous to the one banking regulation faced pre-2008, and which post-2008 reforms (Basel III, Dodd-Frank) have since addressed. Two gaps recur: discovering a risk is not tantamount to acting on it, and individual-model review is unlike managing correlated build-up across the sector. Drawing on the Basel III framework and the U.S. financial-stability architecture, I propose a macro-prudential early warning and response system ("MEWRS") for internal frontier AI. These are systems deployed for labs' own internal research, testing, and production workflows, as distinct from externally released products. Layer A adapts the finder-coordinator-defender early-warning model to route structured reports on dual-use capabilities, autonomy indicators, and security compromises through a government clearinghouse to domain-specific defender working groups. Layer B calibrates operational controls via three quantitative buffer metrics, namely Effective Compute-at-Risk (ECAR), Cumulative Red-Team Hours (CRTH), and an Alignment Robustness Score (ARS), so that faster capability scaling automatically triggers stronger safeguards, analogously to how risk-weighted assets drive capital ratios under Basel III. I outline the reporting schema, map six Basel III mechanisms onto AI-governance analogues, identify seven failure modes with concrete mitigations, and sketch an exercise-based validation plan. MEWRS is designed to detect correlated risk build-ups across the frontier-AI sector and create pre-committed off-ramps before a cascade unfolds.
About this publication
Preprint. A preprint — posted publicly before or without journal peer review; findings may still be revised.
- Published
- 2026 (4 months ago)
- Citations
- Not recorded for this source
Citation counts come from OpenAlex; none are recorded for this source — absence of a count is not absence of citations.
Related by theme, not necessarily by method or conclusion.
- Artificial Intelligence and Institutional Transformation across Regulatory Economic and Knowledge Systems
Journal of Science Engineering Technology and Management Sciences · 2026 - Governing the Ungovernable: Structural Contradictions, Institutional Limitations, and the Constraints of State Authority in AI Regulation in China and the United States
World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · 2026 - Governing the Ungoverned: A Framework for Responsible AI Deployment in Nigeria’s Informal Economy
International Journal Of Recent Trends In Multidisciplinary Research · 2026 - Digitalization, AI Adoption, and MSME Productivity: An Ibn Khaldunian Perspective
Share Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Islam · 2026
Overview assembled automatically from collected metadata. How this site is built.